|
THE BIBLE’S OWN SADDAM
|
|
Name the “Saddam” of the Bible. |
Yes, Saddam of today has his counterpart in yesteryear. Because this counterpart
is a biblical hero it is rare to hear of anyone speaking this dark truth.
The fact is that his name appears more than any other with more pages about
his life and exploits than there are of Jesus. |
I read a modern biography of the man after Christmas, written by the book
columnist of the Los Angeles Times, Jonathan Hirsch. I warn you that this
is not your usual Sunday School Bible story. |
Hirsch is not only a captivating storyteller, but he does good biblical
scholarship. I am sure there might be disputes about some of his conclusions,
but his sources are first rate. His work is documented and footnoted for
the serious student. |
I say all this to let you know that this is a serious piece of writing.
I also promise you that it is interesting reading. At least I found it
so. I thought I was reading about someone I had never known much about. |
And during the reading I found myself saying, “This guy sounds like
Saddam Hussein!” |
You have probably figured that we are talking about King David of the Old
Testament. The title of the book is “King David, the real life story of
the man who ruled Israel.” |
I would seriously recommend that any preacher who intends to venture a
sermon involving King David read this book first. At the same time I would
say to those who could care less about learning anything from the Bible
that this will make an impression on you. |
One thing that makes this of present day worth is the description of the
political realities of the Middle East in that time. You will say that
things haven’t changed that much in 3000 years. I’m talking about a system
of tribes and small kingdoms governed by warlords. These tribes were always
vying for power with ruthless battles for supremacy. |
The rise of David was by a trail of treachery and bloodshed. You are left
to decide which of the many versions of his achievement of the throne to
believe. We may visualize great armies but the true picture is one of bandits
and guerilla tactics with many acts of terrorism. David was no nice guy.
He would slaughter his own people or own family members if it served his
purpose. I mean he slaughtered people by the tens of thousands |
If genocide is not enough to offend lovers of David, what about his womanizing?
It was the right and way of chiefs and kings to possess women of choice.
And David chose many, resulting in many sons, some of whom sought his throne. |
We tend to think of a united nation of some sort. David gradually assumed
leadership of a number of tribes. He was a King of kings. He always had
to protect against those who would kill him in a minute if given the chance.
King David’s kingdom was somewhat like Afghanistan where the nation is
supposedly under control, the leadership is pretty much centered in one
place, while warlords still control the rest of the nation. The name of
the game is to hold the whole system together to some extent. David was
able to do it for a period of time. Just like Saddam. |
What about God in all of this? David never is chummy with God. He rolls
dice to learn God’s will for him. He is sure that God authorized his atrocities
for sake of some purpose of David’s. The evidence indicates that the true
story of David is adjusted by the spin-doctors several centuries after
his time. We find this especially in Ecclesiastes, although similar indications
are found in I and II Samuel. Fascinating. |
Kings are given godly qualities. They acquire an aura of divinity. The
theology of the situation assumes that if one becomes a king it is because
God wants it that way. |
What about the Psalms, presumably written by King David? Modern biblical
scholarship does not share the presumption. We have no evidence of David
being born again. He is a power-driven despot to the end. |
I’ve spoiled the story for you? No. I’ve sort of opened the way so that
you can enjoy the journey without having your senses shocked. You might
come away with a different thought. Mine is that the God depicted in the
story of David is worse than Saddam and that David himself is at least
equal.
— Art Morgan,
Jan. 2004
|